Most people think hydrogen failed

Honestly, I used to understand why.

The first generation of hydrogen stations cost millions, depended on trucked-in fuel, and were built for passenger vehicles that never showed up. Add high-profile failures like Nikola, and it's easy to see why investors became skeptical.

So we asked a different question:

What if hydrogen infrastructure were built specifically for fleets?

At Hexxco, we're developing a model that combines solar power, on-site hydrogen production, ammonia transport, and depot fueling to serve commercial fleets across the NJ/PA/NY corridor.

The goal isn't to compete with every EV.

It's to solve a problem many fleet operators are already facing:

• Long charging downtime

• Grid capacity limitations

• Diesel price volatility

• Increasing emissions requirements

We're currently developing our pilot site in Flemington, NJ, and raising capital through a Regulation Crowdfunding offering.

I'm curious:

If you were building energy infrastructure from scratch today, would you bet on batteries, hydrogen, or both?

Happy to answer questions and share what we've learned. Ask me at Invest@hexco.co

Go to Hexxco.co, where you can read a lot about Hydrogen's new tech on our Insights page.

Investors can learn more here:https://netcapital.com/companies/hexxco/invest

Would you like to meet the founder? InvstGuru Podcast